Selected Alternative

RPA Study Map

The combined Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) has been approved by the Federal Highway Administration which provides the information and rationale supporting Alternative C as the Selected Alternative. The Final EIS concludes that Alternative C would be the most cost-effective alternative and have the least impact on the environment. The ROD officially documents Alternative C as the Selected Alternative.

The Selected Alternative includes:

Illustration of passenger car and box truck

Construction of two new four-lane bridge spans with full shoulders across the Chesapeake Bay, providing additional transportation capacity, reliability and mobility while enhancing safety;

Bridge Icon

Removal of the existing Bay Bridge spans, addressing existing roadway deficiencies including narrow lanes and lack of shoulders, eliminating the need for major rehabilitation projects and associated lane closures and delays;

Cargo ship illustration

Improved navigational clearance to meet U.S. Coast Guard requirements. The navigational clearance will be 230 feet, which is the same as the new Francis Scott Key Bridge, allowing larger ships to access the Port of Baltimore;

lane expansion illustration

Widening of US 50/301 to eight lanes (four per direction) from west of Oceanic Drive to east of Cox Creek to accommodate transitions to the new bridge spans;

Financial commitment for transit-related improvements, with a proposed one-time investment of up to $40 million;

pedestrians illustration

An optional bicycle and pedestrian shared-use path, based on a future financial analysis performed by MDTA to determine whether implementation of a shared-use path will be feasible; and

Farmland Icon

A commitment for land preservation on the Eastern Shore.

Selected Alternative Lane Configuration

  • The new bridge would provide a total of eight
    12-foot lanes (four per direction) across the Chesapeake Bay on two new spans.
  • The Selected Alternative would retain the existing six lanes along
    US 50/301 on both the Western and Eastern shores.
  • The bridge would provide 12-foot wide median
    shoulders and 14‑foot wide outside shoulders.
US 50/301 Lane Configuration

US 50 / 301

New Bridge Lane Configuration

New Bridge

Selected Alternative Example Bridge Construction Sequencing

Rendering depicting the two existing Bay Bridge spans.

Step 1

Existing eastbound and westbound Chesapeake Bay Bridge spans.

Rendering depicting the two existing Bay Bridge spans as well as the new eastbound span just to the south of the existing one.

Step 2

A new eastbound span (yellow) would be constructed first, south of the existing spans.

Rendering depicting the existing westbound span, the new eastbound span (in yellow), and the removal of the existing eastbound span (in red).

Step 3

Removal of the existing eastbound span (red) would follow.

Rendering depicting the existing westbound span, the new eastbound span (in yellow), and the westbound span (in yellow) just north of the previous eastbound span.

Step 4

A new westbound span (yellow) would then be constructed between the existing bridge spans.

Rendering depicting the removal of the existing westbound span (in red) and the new eastbound and westbound spans (in yellow).

Step 5

Removal of the existing westbound span (red) would follow.

Rendering depicting the completed new eastbound and westbound spans.

Step 6

Completed new eastbound and westbound Chesapeake Bay Bridge spans.